Tories Aim To Fix Age Of Sexual Consent Issue

Vic Toews, our new Minister of Justice, immediately announced intentions of the new government to raise the age of sexual consent to 16, from the current age of 14.

This is great news to all parents out there. It may not make handling our youngsters any easier, but it will make many who abused the law in the past think twice when approaching youth.

At the time of posting this, the Canwest-Global poll which asks “Do you agree that the age of sexual consent should be raised to be older than 14?” the response was incredibly in favour of raising the age. 91.59% of respondants feel the age should be raised.

If this legislation doesn’t pass, there are going to be a lot of happy child molesters out there, and a lot of pissed off Canadians.

Nortels Woes Appear To Be Over After Out Of Court Settlements

(disclosure) I own some Nortel stock.

For those of you out there who own or have owned Nortel stock, I think the worst is finally over. The company has it’s books back on track, and today we find out they have settled the two class action lawsuits for the tidy sum of $2.5 Billion. This is a big hit to the telecom/datacom giant, but should finally end the non business related worries.

How the markets take them and their products is all up to them. At least now their value will be riding the supply demand curves and not the legal curve balls.

Harper's Words On Senate Reform

Lo and Behold, Stephen Harper’s words on the CBC, responding to a name I know I have seen in the blogosphere somewhere.

Jonathan Champagne: My name is Jonathan Champagne. I’m from Thornhill, Ontario, and a student at Wilfrid Laurier University. Mr. Harper, you’ve been known to advocate for smaller governments and more responsibilities to the provinces. So please tell me, how does this make for a stronger Canada?

Stephen Harper: Well, what I’ve specifically advocated for in this election are two things. First of all, that the federal government give more of its enormous and growing surpluses back to not just lower levels of government, but also to the ordinary people who paid for these surpluses in the first place through overtaxation.

What we propose specifically with federal/provincial arrangements are a couple of things. First of all, that we will respect provincial jurisdiction, and, in particular, try and deal with the fact that the provincial governments do have some authority in the implementation of treaties and in international affairs where they affect provincial jurisdiction.

So we’re asking — we’re going to work with the Council of the Federation to come up with a formal mechanism for provinces to have more of an input into the Canadian position during international treaty negotiations. And we’re also, of course, saying that we’re willing invite Quebec, which has requested to have a role in UNESCO. We’re going to invite them to have a role in UNESCO, similar to the role Quebec now plays in the Francophonie. That’s how we’re going to deal at this moment with trying to respect provincial jurisdiction, work better with the provinces. The other thing I want to do is, you know, I’m a long-time advocate of Senate reform which we’re going to start through an electoral process. One of the things the Senate is supposed to do and what the upper house does in most federations is provide a forum for regional representation in the national government, and I think one of the ways you strengthen the federal government in a large country like Canada is making sure that that government itself better reflects the regional nature of the country.

(emphasis mine)

So there you have it. The whole point of his Senate reform is to give better representation across the country. Why did he appoint Fortier? To give better representation across the country. Flawlessly consistent.

What Have We Here? Harper's Words On Crossing The Floor

Well, this link has Harper’s own words while talking to Peter Mansbridge on the CBC.

Peter Mansbridge: Next question is coming from a city you’re very familiar with, from Calgary.

Colleen Belisle: Hello, my name is Colleen Belisle and I have a question for Stephen Harper regarding the accountability issue. In the past 18 months, I have noticed a number of MPs crossing the floor after the election. This makes me wonder why I should, as a voter, go and vote when my MP can change parties after the election. Mr. Harper, are there any policies that you plan to enforce after the election regarding this issue? Thank you.

Stephen Harper: My short answer is no. And I understand the voters’ frustration. You can imagine I feel that frustration as much as anyone. I was the victim of a number of the particular incidents that the voter is referring to, that Colleen’s referring to, but the difficulty, Peter – I know that many members of Parliament have put forward various proposals that would restrict the right of MPs to cross the floor, force elections, or whatever. I haven’t seen one yet that convinces me that it would create anything other than a situation where party leaders have even more power over the individual members of Parliament. And, as you know, I’ve said that, of course, I’ve said that for a long time that I think our members of Parliament need more authority, need to be able to represent their constituents’ views, and they may make very bad decisions in crossing from a good party to a bad party or, more particularly, a winning party to a losing party. But that all said, I haven’t seen one yet that I’m convinced creates a bigger problem than it’s actually trying to fix.

Peter Mansbridge: Do you think voters are as uncomfortable as Ms. Belisle points out when these kinds of things happen? Because if they are, one assumes that they are looking for direction from their political leaders to prevent this from happening. As you pointed out, some parties, the NDP has said it would force an immediate election. Do you think something has to be done?

Stephen Harper: Let me give a concrete example of an alternative situation. The Conservative Party of Canada, the new Conservative Party was created because people left actually no less than three separate old caucuses, two old parties, and joined with a new party, and I think there is widespread consensus among not just members of the old parties, but members of the public as well that this was a good thing to create a stronger opposition, to end the fragmentation of the conservative movement in the country.

Now, you know, this kind of law could have forced us into a situation where we were having 75 byelections. So, you know, that’s a problem with any of these proposals. We understand, I understand why people want them, and, believe me, there’s a couple of cases that have happened where I’d love to have a law like this, but there’s also a lot of downsides when you think it through. As I say, in a practical matter, I could see how party leaders could really abuse that particular provision to make it even more difficult for members who may disagree legitimately with their party to operate within the party.

(emphasis mine)

That should silence those who feel Harper went back on his promises regarding democratic reform. Did we, as Conservatives, have a right to be upset when Belinda crossed? Yes. But it was because we feel betrayed, not because we feel crossing the floor should be outlawed.

Our system is designed to vote for a candidate, not by party lines. As I pointed out here a party can be more popular than a candidate, but that is now how our electoral system is built. We elect an MP, not a leader and not a party.

Emerson's Appointment Was A Stroke Of Genius

I love all you Tories out there, but for the ones slamming the Emerson cabinet post, I have a big fat raspberry for y’all.

PHHHhhhhtttthhhhhhhh

February 6, 2006, The Vancouver Board of Trade

The Vancouver Board of Trade welcomes B.C. representation in cabinet

The Vancouver Board of Trade today welcomed western representation in Prime Minister Stephen Harper’s new federal cabinet.

“We’re pleased with the new cabinet and especially with the strong representation from B.C. with the appointment of four B.C. MPs: David Emerson, Stockwell Day, Chuck Strahl and Gary Lunn,” commented Darcy Rezac, managing director, The Vancouver Board of Trade.

Rezac also applauded the appointment of former Liberal minister of industry, David Emerson, who has crossed the floor to his new Conservative cabinet post as minister of international trade and minister for the Pacific Gateway and the Vancouver-Whistler Olympics.

“I believe he has put Canada and British Columbia ahead of politics,” he said. “As a skilled public policy practitioner and with his vast experience in business, particularly in the forestry sector, and in international trade, he will make a strong representative for B.C. He has a long-standing association with the Olympic Games and developing the Pacific Gateway strategy. This can now be continued and will serve Vancouver and B.C. well in the long-term.”

Rezac also commented on the new structure of the Conservative government. “We are particularly pleased that the foreign affairs and international trade departments will once again be integrated.”

For further information, contact Terry Hadley, communications manager, The Vancouver Board of Trade, at 604-641-1271.

On top of the raspberry above, Liberal Premiere Gordon Campbell also endorses the decision to put Emerson in place. When this guy fixes softwood lumber and puts thousands of Canadians back to work, everyone in the Liberal/NDP loaded province will be thankful.

Canadian Visas Sold In Poland For $8000 – Bypassing Background Checks

Have a gander at this in the Ottawa Sun.

Mounties are probing an alleged immigration scam at the Canadian Embassy in Poland in which dozens of Poles may have been sent here illegally without background checks.

And how much do you think our maple flavoured visas go for in Poland?

Poles in Canada said they dished out $8,000 to an Etobicoke man for each visa to bring their relatives here.

And just who do you think would pay this much for a visa which bypasses background checks?

“There were no background checks required,” said one Toronto-area Pole, who knew others who said they paid for visas. “Even the worst criminal can buy a visa for Canada.”

Even the worst criminal. How screwed are we on this one? Potential thieves, doctors, rapists, lawyers, etc. roaming our streets

Canada's Cabinet Ministers For The 39th Parliament

Here it is with links to the gc.ca profiles.

AMBROSE, Rona
Minister of the Environment
BAIRD, John
President of the Treasury Board
BERNIER, Maxime
Minister of Industry
BLACKBURN, Jean-Pierre
Minister of Labour and Minister of the Economic Development Agency of Canada for the Regions of Quebec
CANNON, Lawrence
Minister of Transport, Infrastructure and Communities
CHONG, Michael
President of the Queen’s Privy Council for Canada, Minister of Intergovernmental Affairs and Minister for Sport
CLEMENT, Tony
Minister of Health and Minister for the Federal Economic Development Initiative for Northern Ontario
DAY, Stockwell Burt
Minister of Public Safety
EMERSON, David
Minister of International Trade and Minister for the Pacific Gateway and the Vancouver-Whistler Olympics
FINLEY, Diane
Minister of Human Resources and Social Development
FLAHERTY, James Michael (Jim)
Minister of Finance
FORTIER, Michael
Minister of Public Works and Government Services
HARPER, Stephen Joseph
Prime Minister
HEARN, Loyola
Minister of Fisheries and Oceans
LEBRETON, Marjory
Leader of the Government in the Senate
LUNN, Gary
Minister of Natural Resources
MACKAY, Peter Gordon
Minister of Foreign Affairs and Minister of the Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency
NICHOLSON, Robert Douglas
Leader of the Government in the House of Commons and Minister for Democratic Reform
O’CONNOR, Gordon
Minister of National Defence
ODA, Bev
Minister of Canadian Heritage and Status of Women
PRENTICE, Jim
Minister of Indian Affairs and Northern Development and Federal Interlocutor for Metis and Non-Status Indians
SKELTON, Carol
Minister of National Revenue and Minister of Western Economic Diversification
SOLBERG, Monte
Minister of Citizenship and Immigration
STRAHL, Charles (Chuck)
Minister of Agriculture and Agri-Food and Minister for the Canadian Wheat Board
THOMPSON, Gregory Francis
Minister of Veterans Affairs
TOEWS, Vic
Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada
VERNER, Josée
Minister of International Cooperation and Minister for La Francophonie and Official Languages

Five Reasons The Emerson Defection Is Good For Us All

David Emerson’s defection to the Tories isn’t all the news starved MSM makes it out to be. Think on this.

1) Emerson has a background in the forestry sector and is now our International Trade Minister. What better combination to head straight into the softwood lumber issue and resolve it quickly.

2) Liberals should be pleased. One of their own, with his own mind and his own free vote, is now sitting in Cabinet. He might not be a Liberal by party anymore, but I don’t think Emerson’s views on other issues have changed.

3) The man has experience in a Federal Cabinet, which a new government can learn a lot from.

4) In situations which the Tories/NDP gang up in Parliament, this eliminates the value of the Independent seat, which eliminates the bargaining needed to pass these motions.

5) In its’ own subtle way, along with the Michael Fortier appointment, tells the other parties to play ball on accountability, because this kind of shhhaving cream is what the accountability act will prevent.