…And now we have something we will blame on global cooling.
*clearing throat*
Ahem…Now I will do my best impersonation of Al Gore.
Bawwkkk Bawwkkk Bawwwkkkkkkk….
Bawwkkk Bawwkkk Bawwwkkkkkkk….
You either pay attention or pay through the nose. I would rather pay attention.
…And now we have something we will blame on global cooling.
*clearing throat*
Ahem…Now I will do my best impersonation of Al Gore.
Bawwkkk Bawwkkk Bawwwkkkkkkk….
Bawwkkk Bawwkkk Bawwwkkkkkkk….
I wonder if all those ambitious wankers who sign up to their campus Liberal club have started wetting their khaki dockers over their life commitment to the Big Dreamers. What once looked like a meal ticket now’s a chump’s dead end.
Blogger ChuckerCanuck discussing what must be going through young Liberal minds after the Liberal Party popularity numbers sink to 23%, a low water mark.
Right now across Canada there are Liberal youth who should read this and rethink which campus club they plan to join.
Right now in the news the Liberal Party of Canada is working hard to make giant novelty cheques dirty. Whenever governments spend money, they have traditionally had a big novelty cheque created which the local politicians and the representatives of those receiving the money have a photo op. This has been customary for decades or even longer.
Yet now that they have demanded billions on infrastructure spending, I find it completely ridiculous that the Liberals feel the photo ops are abuse of tax dollars for partisan purposes. Below is a snippit from the National Post from Saturday February 19th, 2000.
OTTAWA and QUEBEC CITY – Jean Chretien, the Prime Minister, yesterday said his government had nothing to apologize for in seeking to reap maximum partisan political benefit from disbursing $1-billion worth of federal job grants across Canada each year.
He had always made sure since taking power in October, 1993, that voters were left in no doubt that it was his Liberals who were distributing such grants, he said.
“Listen,” he added, “we are the government … I don’t see why we can’t try to get credit for what we do. I hope we do so. There is nothing to be ashamed in that.”
Thanks to Stephen Taylor for digging this one up.
Now correct me if I am wrong but was Jean Chretien not a Liberal? The fact that the Liberals didn’t seem to mind mind “cashing in” on the photo ops when they were in power just makes them look like hypocrites now that the shoe is on the other foot.
I’ve had it. You should have had it too. OLGC boondoggles (not one but TWO), HST implementation without cutting the mill rate, A health tax levy weeks after taking office and now eHealth.
I’m sick and tired of Dalton “YellowBellied” McShifty running rickshaw over Ontario taxpayers.
The Gomery Commission was called by a Liberal when it was reported a $250 Million dollar program could possibly have as much as $100 Million wasted.
And yet Yellowbelly himself rejects a call for a public inquiry into the eHealth Boondoggle that is over 10 times as bad.
What’s that you ask? 10 times Mulder? Surely you jest.
No friggin way! The numbers don’t lie. The Auditor General says that in a billion dollar program, the tax payers received only hundreds of millions of dollars in value. Well do the math. 1000 million minus hundreds of millions means hundreds of millions may have been wasted.
The Sponsorship Scandal was $250 Million over 33 Million Canadians. That’s about $7.50 for every man, woman and child in this country.
And eHealth? Just do the math. $1 BILLION, that’s 1000 Million being wasted of Ontario taxpayer dollars. $1 Billion over 11.4 Million people is a whopping $87.72 for every man, woman and child in Ontario.
That’s 11.7 times how bad the Sponsorship Scandal was to the Federal Liberals.
But this is not the only reason “blood is shooting out of my eyes“. The fact that the Premier is not willing to investigate should ring bells loud and clear that a criminal investigation should take place. Yet who is responsible for administering the Canadian Criminal Code? The provinces. So who would be the authority in Ontario that would appoint a special prosecutor to this? The Ontario Attorney General. And who appoints the Ontario Attorney General? Dalton Friggin McGuinty.
If this isn’t the Fox watching the Henhouse then nothing is.
I think the Federal government should be putting in a special request to the Province of Ontario to uphold the Criminal Code and investigate this larceny of the grandest kind.
McGuinty’s government put the Mayor of Ottawa through the ringer for posible influence peddling that (if it had been true) would have cost the tax payers a few hundred thousand dollars, yet he won’t investigate A BILLION FREAKING DOLLAR BOONDOGGLE!!
Blood should be shooting out of your eyes too!!! Talk about taxpayers being completely bent over and getting OfficiallyScrewed.
If you are a party member, he spoke to you in your email. If you were a fan of his show, you saw him riding the fine line between the parties. And if you are lucky enough to have him speak in a riding near you, I highly encourage people to go see Senator Mike Duffy.
“Duff” as he is affectionately known, has a wonderful gift of making politicos in the room stop mesmerized by his words.
But unlike his TV show, the new Senator Duffy is as partisan as you can get and he is pulling out all the stops to let Canadians know that the current Conservative government is doing things the right way.
I was lucky enough to see him speak at the Nepean-Carleton Ministerial reception last week and it was a fantastic night.
If you are in the Ottawa area, you can catch Senator Duffy speaking at the Carleton-Mississippi Mills 5th Annual Fall Supper on October 29th. I’ll be in attendance myself and look forward to hearing him again.
Conservative Prime Minister Harper displays his musical talents at the NAC with YoYoMa.
If you recall, we host a video of Jack Layton singing and playing guitar.
Ironically, both men are playing nicely together in the Canadian House of Commons.
h/t Stephen Taylor
Below is an email sent from CBC Radio Ottawa to community associations all over the area. The bias is quite clear when you read the sections I have bolded below.
Hi everyone,
I’m an associate producer with the CBC here in Ottawa.We are doing some research in anticipation of a possible federal election this fall.
The reason I am contacting community organizations is to find people with real life issues and stories that may be directly affected by whatever changes occur after a federal election.
To give you an example: if you know of someone in your neighbourhood or community who is struggling to find work, who is living off employment insurance or someone who didn’t qualify under the existing rules. Maybe you have a friend or relative who is dealing with legal issues and wanting or needing something to change under federal law. Perhaps you know of someone who is trying to bring family members into Canada from their home country and having trouble making their way through the refugee and immigration system. Or maybe you know of someone who is hoping to make a new life here but is running into obstacles such as having credentials recognized by Canadian institutions.
There are often stories like these that happen in our very own neighbourhoods.
We are interested in hearing these stories – maybe it’s even something that you yourself are dealing with, living through right now…
If so, please reply to this email and tell me about it.
We are striving to make election coverage about more than polls and percentages.
Community-minded people like you can help us do that.
I look forward to speaking (or emailing) with you!
Best
(Name Removed)
Associate Producer
CBC Radio Ottawa
In every one of the sections bolded above, the request is for issues that are currently negative but might be discussion points or election issues. The implicit but clear point is that they are looking for situations that are negative under the current (Conservative) government. No where does it ask for issues that are currently positive and might be in jeopardy should the current (Conservative) government fall.
Some may say this is inadvertent, but I think the bias is pretty clear.
Foreign Affairs Minister Lawrence Cannon will let Libyan nutjob (yeah I went there) Moammar Daffy Quaddafi know that Canada was not impressed with the fanfare Libya gives returning convicted terrorists.
Bravo to the Prime Minister for aiming Cannon in the right direction.
Michael Ignatieff reminds me of Sir Galahad in Monty Python’s Holy Grail when he gets to the Bridge of Death.
Bridgekeeper: Stop. Who would cross the Bridge of Death must answer me these questions three, ere the other side he see.
Sir Michael of Ignatieff: Ask me the questions, bridgekeeper. I am not afraid.
Bridgekeeper: What… is your name?
Sir Michael of Ignatieff: My name is Sir Michael of Ignatieff.
Bridgekeeper: What… is your quest?
Sir Michael of Ignatieff: To become Prime Minister of Canada.
Bridgekeeper: Would you create a coalition with socialists and separatists?
Sir Michael of Ignatieff: Yes…err No!!!
To view the actual Monty Python scene, visit this link:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4b4bGAoVR7g
I may have iterated this story before but a few years ago my son was asking what the difference between the political parties really is. Knowing that at his age a long drawn out response would simply bore him to death and turn his interest level way down, I gave him the following explanation which I believe still stands today.
Everyone pays taxes and those taxes go to wards paying for some of the things it makes sense to pay for together. All parties agree that some money is needed to do these things.
But let’s say you make $10 an hour at your job.
The Conservative Party would take $3 of that money and let you decide how you want to spend the remaining $7.
The Liberal Party would take $4 and let you decide on how to spend the other $6.
And the NDP would take $6 of that money and leave you with only $4 to spend the way you want.
In my opinion, this is a valuable math lesson for all of us.