Minister Ambrose Tips Hand On Tory Environmental Policy

For all the hard knocks Environment Minister Rona Ambrose has been taking, she has stood tall defending the “Made In Canada” plan that she and her Ministry have been working on.

The NDP and Liberals have pounded away on the Tory budget claiming it had minimal spending for the environment and that it just shows the weakness in the Tory plan.

But what’s this? A sneak preview? Could the Tories possibly knock Jack back a step?

Tentatively dubbed Green Plan II, it will include a Clean Air Act with long-term targets and new money for national parks, sources said.

It’s being touted as the most wide-ranging program of its kind since former Tory Prime Minister Brian Mulroney announced his $3-billion Green Plan in 1991.

The strategy will include a clean water framework, a clean technology strategy, regulation of toxic chemicals and new measures to clean up contaminated sites, said a source who has been briefed on its contents.

The environmental assessment process is also expected to be revamped.

Lest we forget who the Greenest Prime Minister in History was. If this plan even comes close to the original Green Plan, then I think the current administration will have a home run on it’s hands.

H/T Kerplonka

The Best Toilet In The World

Considering there has been much talk lately about the “wizkids“, many blogs continue to write about urination and the forces of nature that make people go in public.

I have a great solution, but it would require investment, and a few laws being changed depending on the province.

Why am I suggesting this you might ask? Well three or four years ago, I too was down at the Canada Day festivities and my bladder started calling. So me and my family went into the Tim Horton’s not far from the Hill. There was a huge lineup and when I took my turn and walked into the single toilet bathroom (no stalls), I was gagging. The toilet bowl was full to the brim with a filthy brown water. The reek was immense.

And as is pointed out in a post by Proud To Be Canadian, many places around the country have issues with bathrooms. Be it a lack of them, or bars/restaurants having rules stating the facilities are to be only used by patrons, or as I experienced, during busy events, some bathrooms just cannot be cleaned frequently enough.

Here is the solution. I would suggest putting these all over cities in the heart of the bar districts, wherever events are held, and in various tourist attraction areas.

Self Cleaning Toilet

I came across this very bathroom while walking along the Piers in San Francisco. The bathroom is a pay bathroom with a grated floor. It is stainless steel and after each usage, the door closes, and the bathroom starts churning away as it “self cleans”. After waiting in line behind a couple of people I took my turn. The water was still dripping off the grates when I entered but the toilet was spotless and dry. The sink was spotless and dry. And it was the best money I ever spent.

The only drawback was the time it took to do the cleaning. But if you supplement them with a few portapottys, or allow a cleaning bypass for families lined up together, they could prove to be the answer to the problems plagued by drunk youth and those with weak bladders.

In My Front Yard

I went out front to shoot some hoops with the kids tonight when my daughter started squeaking “Daddy, a deer, a deer!!”. I turned around, looked across the street and sure enough there was a deer. I quickly grabbed my camera and snapped a couple of shots.

Deer Out Front July 8th 2006

We didn’t want to spook it but considering I live in suburbia (with the houses across the street not built yet) it was a nice treat on a Saturday evening.

Only The CBC Can Erroneously Turn Plankton Into A Story About Global Warming

Ask any environmentalist what the cause of global warming and they will tell you that greenhouse gases trapping the sun’s rays in our atmosphere is the dominant cause. We already have told you that 97 to 99% of greenhouse gases are water vapour which is not something within the control of man.

But tonight on the CBC nightly news they were talking about the large wave of Phytoplankton present off the west coast of North America. They even went so far as to say that it might be an effect of global warming.

What they did NOT tell you is that phytoplankton thrive on carbon dioxide, the “other” culprit in the greenhouse effect, and convert it to harmless oxygen.

From Wikipedia:

Phytoplankton, like plants, obtain energy through a process called photosynthesis, and so must live in the well-lit surface layer (termed the euphotic zone) of an ocean, sea, or lake. Through photosynthesis, phytoplankton (and terrestrial plants) are responsible for much of the oxygen present in the Earth’s atmosphere.

So let’s get this straight. Mother earth heals herself by creating more plant life and phytoplanton when weather warms, which in turn eat up more carbon dioxide, which reduces the greenhouse effect, thus cooling the earth naturally.

Only the CBC could get this story completely ass backwards and put a further fear of global warming into society when the completely opposite is true. This healing plant lifeform may be an effect of a warmer spring as they mentioned, but it is also a buffer against the carbon dioxide that traps heat in our atmosphere.

ADDENDUM I was contacted by CBCwatch.ca regarding my posting above. They say that they watched the National starting at mark 19:00 and they said:

I could find no statement by Natalie Clancy, nor those interviewed implying or suggesting that the phytoplankton was responsible for global warming.

Alternately, Angelica Pena of Institute of Ocean Sciences sad “we don’t know the consequences of global warming”

So I took a closer look.

At mark 21:07, Natalie Clancy says “Pena says it COULD be a sign of global warming.” (emphasis was Natalie’s not mine.)

Right after the above quote, the cut goes to Pena who says:

We don’t know and that I think is the worst thing about (i couldn’t make out the word) sciences is that we don’t know what are the consequences of climate change on the phtyoplankton or the ecosystem community. We are still trying to, you know, learn what are the consequences but we have no idea.

So the CBC took Pena’s words stating they have no clue what the effects of global warming are on they phytoplankton and turned them into “Pena says it COULD be a sign of global warming”. I wonder how they came to that conclusion.

To continue:

At mark 21:30, Natalie Clancy says “Scientists say they will have to monitor plankton on the BC coast for a few years before they will know for sure if all this algae is blooming because the planet is heating up (long pause) or simply because this has been an unusually warm spring.”

This last quote is emphasized because it happens right before Clancy’s sign off.

This may not be enough for CBCwatch.ca to call bad journalism, but for the CBC to TWICE discuss the warming of the planet without a stitch of proof is bad journalism and quite misleading. I encourage you to watch the clip yourself from mark 19:00 on and let me know what you think?

Kyoto Schmoto – The Left Is Barking Up The Wrong Tree

Today I stopped by the corner store to get a plastic bottle. It happened to have some water already in it, but I happen to like the shape and feel of this particular plastic bottle and refill it from the filtered water my refrigerator produces. (Reduce, Reuse, Recycle and all that.)The cost of said bottle of water? $2.79 for one liter.

I happened to fill my truck up at a gas station an hour later and what did I pay? Approximately $1.03 for each liter. (Just putting things in perspective).

Considering 97% of green house gases are comprised of water vapour, (yes you heard right), I find it hard to comprehend why the left is begging for Canada to continue with it’s Kyoto commitments. Our planet’s surface is about 70% covered by water. Storms churn in and out on a regular basis spewing water vapour in the air, maintaining the levels of green house gases as the tiny particles float around in the four winds.

I think the left would be better off criticizing Poseidon and Mother Nature instead of beating on big oil.

And in case this doesn’t convince the left to change their target, I would like remind them that whenever they buy anything made of plastic they are supporting big oil because plastic is made from petroleum. Go figure.

The final word?

“Evian spelled backwards is naive”

-Dennis Miller

ADDENDUM:  I posted a few myths about Kyoto back in January and the link is only available via my archives (due to a change in blog software).  For those interested in some really interesting facts about Kyoto and global warming, please have a look.  You will be shocked at some of the information that the lefties aren’t telling you.

Trudeau Gets A Mountain, But Where Is Diefenbaker's??

After reading Syncrodox Sez’s article about the naming of a mountain after the Rt. Honourable Pierre Elliot Trudeau, I took it up on myself to do a bit of research on the naming of mountains in Canada after our illustrious leaders.

I did find some interesting facts out though.

1) Wilfred Laurier has 3 (count ’em) mountains named after him.

2) John Diefenbaker has no mountain named after him.

3) Chretien tried having the tallest mountain in Canada named after Trudeau shortly after his death in 2000. The locals around Mount Logan protested hard, and were thankfully, successful in blocking the naming.

4) The average height above sea level of Tory Prime Minister peaks is 3066.25 metres, and the average height above sea level of Grit Prime Minister peaks is 2736.4 metres (when counting all of Laurier’s peaks) and 3004.8 (when counting only Laurier’s tallest peak)

5) The average prominence of Tory Prime Minister peaks is 396.25 metres, and the average prominence of Grit Prime Minister peaks is 825.7 metres (when counting all of Laurier’s peaks) and 812.2 metres (when counting only Laurier’s tallest peak)

A grid showing these features can be seen below (click to enlarge)

I guess the purpose of all this was to point out that I am not upset that Trudeau now has a mountain. But I am now thinking that Diefenbaker deserves a mountain of his own. Why has he been overlooked? Whether or not he was a popular PM, or whether or not he was a long standing PM should also not matter. The man lead our nation and deserves his place in Canadian geographical history with the rest.

Diefenbaker has been Officially Screwed!!

Smackdown Of The Week (June 4th, 2006)

I love this one. Jean Charest has challenged Gilles Duceppe to put up or shut up.

Charest issued the dare Friday in response to Bloc Leader Gilles Duceppe’s accusation earlier this week that the premier has shown “no backbone” in demanding that Prime Minister Stephen Harper share the cost of reducing greenhouse gas emissions.

“If he (Duceppe) believes in what he’s saying, unless it’s empty rhetoric, well then he’ll vote against the budget in the House of Commons,” Charest retorted angrily.

“So we’ll see who has backbone.”

Charest said Duceppe should stop telling him how to do his job and start doing his own.

“Mr. Duceppe is the leader of a federal party that sits in the House of Commons with a minority government. He’s not the premier of Quebec,” Charest said.

Roasto Toasto!!! Backbone indeed. He may as well have told Duceppe his cajones are as big as chick peas.

Ahhh, Jean. You may be a Liberal now, but you still have a place in my heart.

Smackdown Of The Week (May 11th, 2006)

The exchange below took place in Question Period today, May 11th, 2006. The Smackdown of the Week was the Prime Minister’s reply.

Scott Brison (Liberal – Kings-Hants, NS): Mr. Speaker, this is what the Prime Minister said. “The science is still evolving with respect to climate change. It is a scientific hypothesis and the controversial one that may be a lot of fun for a few scientific and environmental elites in Ottawa.” When the Prime Minister doesn’t even believe in the science of climate change, why is the Environment Minister trying to chair a climate change conference?

Prime Minister Harper: Mr. Speaker, the Minister of Environment is putting together a real plan to deal with climate change. Let me read a description of the previous governments plan. “Instead, the previous plans in terms of Kyoto agreement was written on the back of an airplane napkin on the way to Kyoto. There was no altered planning. There was no real negotiations with the provinces or with industry sectors. In fact, it was a last minute, hastily drafted, agreement.” Those were the words of the member for Kings-Hants.

Our Prime Minister sure has his QP rebuttals ready to go. He whipped Brison back so fast and hard, that Brison’s office was probably inundated with calls from chiropractors from around the country offering their services.

Together We Can Move A Mountain … Carp Mountain To Be Specific

On Saturday April 22nd at 9 am there will be a mass of people gathering at the new Stittsville flea market at Hazeldean Rd. and Carp Rd. for a march up to the landfill at Carp Rd. and the 417 in an effort to show that the expansion of the dump is not wanted by local residents.

This might be a nice way for you and your kids to celebrate Earth Day. (I probably sound like a lefty but no one should have to live in their own filth. Even animals are smart enough to get rid of their waste away from where they live.

I encourage all residents in West Ottawa to head on down and enjoy what will hopefully be a nice warm day (but not so warm that the dump starts breathing).

You can visit NoDump.ca for more information.

The Numerical Truth About Ice Caps, Global Warming, And The Empty Threat Of Floods

I am starting to get quite upset at the fear factor card being played by environmentalistas and their ilk who think that the polar caps melting will cause flooding and devastation across the globe. So I am going to take a second and tell you a story my dad told me as a kid.

In the Greek city of Syracuse, a couple of thousand years ago, the king was having a problem with goldsmiths pilfering his gold by substituting lead in with the gold when it was melted down. Once it was reformed, it was difficult for the king to know if he was getting ripped by the goldsmiths.

So he asked his chief scientist, Archimides to figure out a way to catch them if they did substitute something in. Archimides was befuddled with the idea until one day, while dipping himself in the tub for a bath, he noted the displacement of the water. In this bathtub the concept of density was born. Archimidis, in his excitement at solving the problem for the king, jumped out of the tub, and streaked down the streets of Syracuse screaming “Evreka!, Evreka!!” or “I’ve found it!!, I’ve found it!!”

Density is how much mass something has with respect to the volume it takes up. Regular tap water has a density of 1000 kg/m3 . (A nice round number that happens to be that way because of the beauty of the metric system). But other substances, such as gold are much higher, whereas, oil is quite a bit lower explaining is why it floats.

Let’s apply Archimides discovery of density to icebergs. (Because after all, the north polar cap is just a giant iceberg)

First let me explain to you what happens when liquid water is cooled enough to form ice. The temperature drops and as water begins to freeze, it expands. This is because the density of ice is about 920 kg/m3, and that of sea water is 1025 kg/m3.

So what does this mean? It means the ice is less dense than it used to be as water. With this density decrease, the ice begins to float, because in a way, it is lighter than sea water. The ratio of ice that is “pushed” above water is about 10% of the mass of ice. This concept is best understood if you do not think in terms of ice floating, but instead, think in terms of the ice below sealevel being lighter than the surrounding water enough to lift about 10% of it’s mass above water. The mass in this case is the top of the iceberg but could be anything, such as ohhhhh, an expedition heading to the north pole or a harp seal waiting to become a nice jacket.

If you were to put a weight equivalent to this 10% on top of an iceberg, the iceberg would sink until it’s top point was just covered by water. In this case, that density decrease WOULD displace more water and raise the sea level. But in reality there is no weight to push icebergs underwater. There is only Archimides and the math behind density. And density says that they can freeze or melt all they want. If they do it while floating in the oceans they will not affect sea level.

That’s the Officially Screwed math lesson for the day. Now if you want to amaze your friends, take a clear glass jug, fill it about 2/3rds full of cold water, and toss in as much ice as you like so long as none touches the bottom of the jug. Then mark the waterlevel and wait for the ice to melt. The ice that floats up above the waterline will have no effect on where the water level is when it melts. You should note that the water level is exactly where you marked it.

Go and amaze your lefty friends with what they will consider a parlour trick, but you can rest assured is simple science that is over 2000 years old.