Fox News Legal Eagle Megyn Kelly Smarter Than Every Democrat, Obama, Mexican President Calderon, And 90% of Hollywood

Megyn KellyFox News Channel anchor and regular guest on the O’Reilly factor, Megyn Kelly, exposes those who oppose the Arizona immigration law. How so? She actually read the new law and compared it to the federal law. So what did she come up with?

Well in a 2005 Supreme Court ruling in Muehler vs. Mena, the highest court in the land ruled (in section 14 of the judgment):

.. the officers did not need reasonable suspicion to ask Mena for her name, date and place of birth, or immigration status.

The actual Arizona law states that someone cannot be questioned without reasonable cause so it doesn’t even go as far as the most recent law of the land. So to all the celebrities, moonbats, NBC guests, lefties, Democrats, and yes, even the POTUS Barack Obama, who have teased, joked, implied you could be out with your family for ice cream and this law lets them search you, well….You are ALL wrong.

The Federal Law is far tougher than the new Arizona law.

Nice Job Megyn Kelly.

7 thoughts on “Fox News Legal Eagle Megyn Kelly Smarter Than Every Democrat, Obama, Mexican President Calderon, And 90% of Hollywood

  • May 21, 2010 at 8:56 am

    Compare any of Fox’s anchors to Canada’s.
    Canada is a joke.

  • May 21, 2010 at 6:19 pm

    The Dems are fighting this because they want illegal immigrants that they can convert into votes for their party. In this plan, all border states would become Democrat states and thus Obama and his slimy friends would enjoy power forever.

  • May 21, 2010 at 9:28 pm

    Regardless of what one thinks about the Arizona law, one should not be misled by the holding of this case.

    This case held that while a person was already in lawful custody, officers could question a person with regard to immigration status, provided that the person was aware that they were not required to answer. Megyn left out these details.

    Furthermore, I don’t think the controversy over Arizona law is whether people already in lawful custody can be questioned about their immigration status. The controversy and fervor is with regard to whether the law allows for the stopping of people for the sole reason of asking them about their immigration status.

    Some people argue the law does allow for this, some seem to argue that it does not.

    If it does allow such stoppings, then by what does an officer base a finding of reasonable suspicion with regard to immigration status.

    That’s the real issue. This case is irrelevant.

  • July 13, 2010 at 1:49 pm

    Great job with Kirsten…I have never liked her!!
    I was sitting her yelling….GO, MEGYN!!!!!!!! GO!!!!
    You are my favorite…better than any of the men on Fox news..
    You are not afraid to tell it like it is a la Ronald Regan!!!!!
    Helen Cook Abercrombie

  • July 29, 2010 at 1:26 pm


    Watching Fox Channel with you on and other of your cronnies is compared to HIDLER talking to the JEWS. Obama and his administrations are here today to clean up your shit that your BUSH administration left behind during your eight years in office. Obama has only been in the office for one and half years and has done and padged up the mess that you and C Beg BUSH adminstrations have left this country in big and deep shit.

    Bae 🙁

  • September 2, 2011 at 3:34 am

    Realy you are the best one I have seen Thank you.

  • February 16, 2013 at 8:57 am

    When are WE THE PEOPLE going to act on IMPEACEMENT charges on obama, he is throughting the U.S. to the DOGS

Comments are closed.