BTW, take a look at the TV4 show on “The Great Global Warming Swindle” and hear the interview with the producer yesterday in Winnipeg – see http://www.nrsp.com/news.html .

Then in your last post (#35) you state that you yourself retired 13 years ago and have not published since 1985, some 22 or so years ago.

I think I will stop wasting my time reading your posts and go back to Dr. Ball. He’s far more mainstream wouldn’t you say?”

For a guy with a degree you’re awfully thick. I’m not competing with climatologists, then or now. I’m merely stating that I’ve coauthored scientific papers in the past, and that I would expect to see any evidence of global warming, one way or the other, in such papers thereby giving credibility to claims.

Tom [37], are you sure of the title you quoted? I could not find it at the Ecological Complexity website, when I searched there (seeking to pay by credit card for access).

Then in your last post (#35) you state that you yourself retired 13 years ago and have not published since 1985, some 22 or so years ago.

I think I will stop wasting my time reading your posts and go back to Dr. Ball. He’s far more mainstream wouldn’t you say?

None. Where did you get that idea?

“Now I must also add that your first link listing you as a Research Associate lists you as an “Electronics Technician”. And this qualifies you how??”

Working closely with the principal researcher taught me a lot (although
it has been a while).

“Heck, even I am an Electronics Engineering Technologist with a B.Sc.”

Oh.

“What degree did you say you have?”

I didn’t.

“Because my gut is telling me you set up the computers that they did their erroneous climate modeling on.”

Then you would be wrong. I was actually an ‘Electronics Technologist III’ in UofT jargon, a ‘IV’ meaning that you supervised other techs, but as I was on my own (as grants don’t normally cover techs) I had the ear of the Prof. As I previously said, I worked in Cell Physiology, and later in Cloud Physics closely it both cases with the principal researcher. I never indicated that we had anything to do with climate, and was just saying that ‘scientific papers’ are not new to me.

The two papers I coauthored (in cell physiology) are (1)”Low-Frequency Voltage Noise in a Mammalian Bone Cell Close” Journal of Cellular Physiology 113:267-272 (1982) and (2)”Transient and Sustained Effects of Hormones and Calcium on Membrane Potential in a Bone Cell Close” Journal of Cellular Physiology 122:53-58 (1985). I designed and supplied the electronic interfaces and did some of the research.

Later in the Department of Physics I designed a built interfaces to PC’s along with supporting software, mostly in assembly for wind tunnels, field instruments and Doppler radar. I retired in 1994.

Thanks.

Thanks, I somehow missed that. There’s a lot of interesting info there.

FP: You make the shrewd observation of how political correctness engenders evil because of “the violence that it does to people’s souls by forcing them to say or imply what they do not believe, but must not question.” Can you talk about this a bit?

Dalrymple: Political correctness is communist propaganda writ small. In my study of communist societies, I came to the conclusion that the purpose of communist propaganda was not to persuade or convince, nor to inform, but to humiliate; and therefore, the less it corresponded to reality the better. When people are forced to remain silent when they are being told the most obvious lies, or even worse when they are forced to repeat the lies themselves, they lose once and for all their sense of probity. To assent to obvious lies is to co-operate with evil, and in some small way to become evil oneself. One’s standing to resist anything is thus eroded, and even destroyed. A society of emasculated liars is easy to control. I think if you examine political correctness, it has the same effect and is intended to.

From: http://www.frontpagemagazine.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=19293